If you had a relationship with a business partner or spouse, and you thought everything was going just perfect, and then you learn that your trusted buddy, spouse ( or? ) had been cheating, embezzling ( or? ) and even if the incident was 20 years ago, it would make you very reluctant to trust them with anything.
Prior to 9/11/2001, I had an attitude the most broadcast journalism was at least attempting to inform the public of things that would benefit the public at large. However post 9/11/2001, I have become convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that the media is a propaganda tool.
Research on the subject reveals that its been a tool for Big Money to exercise control for a very long time.
In the late 19th century there was a growing distrust of “big money”, however with ever increasing control over what people read, big money created its own image, that being one of benelelvence. Trust us to bring you the news, the real news, the stuff you need to know.
In1915, the J.P.Morgan company purchased 25 newspapers, in order to control their editorial content. Before Radio or TV, newspapers were the mainstream media and did wield considerable power in shaping public opinion. With editorial control over these newspapers, they could influence public opinion and indeed how people vote.
Walter Cronkite used to say at the end of the news hour, “check your newspapers & radio news for more on what was covered tonight” The network wanted the TV “news” to be the only source the audence would accept as the NEWS. Thus Walter Cronkite adoped the phrase “and thats the way it is . . . . ”
For an example of the government meddding in public opinion, see CIA document 1035-960 its about labeling anything that questions the official story “Conspiracy Theories”
For proof beyond any doubt that the Media & Government are willing and able to act in unison to promote a lie, we need look no further than the events of 9/11/2001 In an nutshell, the official story about what allegedly happened that day. 19 radical Muslims boarded 4 airliners, hijacked said airliners and managed to employ three of them as weapons. FLT11 allegedly struck the north wall of the north tower at a speed of 465 mph. FLT175 allegedly struck the south wall of the south tower at 590 mph. The plane crashes caused such damage as to cause the collapse of the twin towers, that is the complete and total destruction of the towers. And FLT77 allegedly struck the Pentagon at 530 mph. The fourth plane, was allegedly taken back by passengers and crew, and crashed in a field in Pennsylvania completely burying the majority of the wreckage.
In the case of each crash into a wall, the plane was said to have penetrated the wall completely leaving behind <1% of the mass of the plane. And penetration included the wings, in the case of the twin towers, both displayed a “wing-shaped gash”. . Is it not at the very least, suspicious? that three airliners could have penetrated completely into buildings leaving behind >1% of the mass of the plane? Is it not questionable, that the three flights crashed into buildings did so at speeds far in excess of the normal operating parameters for the airliner? .
“No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.” – John Lear
Plane crashes are chaotic and messy. and given the fact that the wing-shaped gash in the tower wall, in addition to the news reports on the subject indicates that the wings were tiltied at aprox a 27 degree angle. This is a very clear indication that the plane upon contact with the wall, would have been subject to asymmetrical forces.
Note that in the case of automotive crash tests, a vehicle slammed into a barrier will have the rear of it rise up, because there was a lot of energy at work and it will manifest in any manner possible. Why was it assumed that the airliners, would penetrate straight into the building? The planes motion is not perfectly aligned with the line from tail to nose ( longitudinal axis ), therefore upon touching the nose to the wall, there would be forces at work in the process subjecting the plane to stress enough to destroy it, before it had any opportunity to make that famous wing-shaped gash additionally, the plane was allegedly off perpendicular to the wall in the following manner. Roll 27 degrees, Yaw 14 degrees, pitch 3 degrees. In this case, the port side wing would contact the wall significantly before the starboard side wing and would add to already asymmetrical force upon the plane.
The tower wall was constructed of 14″ steel box columns spaced 40″ on centers. The box columns were hollow, and had a wall thickness of 1/4″. The outer wall was load-bearing. In order to have penetrated the wall, ( as alleged by the media ) the airliner would have had to: ( exclusive of the wing-shaped gash ) > Bend/break 4 sections of steel box column. > Shear off >40 bolts > displace >5 tons of mass > Force a 5 meter diameter airliner fuselage into a space of 3.6 meteres ( between decks ) there would be resistance, continously as the plane entered the building, ( that is if it entered ).
There a multitude of possibilities for what could happen in a crash of an airliner into a skyscraper wall. To discuss the alternatives to the official story about the alleged FLT175:
A: The plane strikes the wall, the nose is crushed and dragged across the wall without penetrating. Once the part of the fuselage ahead of the wings has been destroyed, the center of gravity will have been shifted and the tail would drop, smashing the belly of the plane against the wall without penetrating.
B: The plane strikes the wall, and pivots about the contact point the tail going up and to the west, smashing the fuselage against the wall without penetrating.
C: The plane strikes the wall and given Conservation of Momentum + Equal & Opposite Reaction, the fuselage fractures, expending energy, a mass of wreckage strikes the wall like a shotgun blast, with minimal penetration or damage to the tower.
Of course this list isn’t all inclusive, there would be a multitude of variables, in logic, it is much more accurately defined as to what most certainly did not happen, rather than what did happen. Having made that case that the media lied and did so in a very serious way, what “news” can be trusted at all?
As a result of the alleged airliner hijacking, TSA was created, and TSA has proven itself to be a bad joke. Remember the liquid-bomb scare? TSA agents would routinely remove bottles of water from travelers carry on bags, and throwing said bottles of suspected explosive into a bin next to the check-point. The whole thing is a total farce. The government lies, and the media is complicit in the fraud. One significant feature of the security theater at the airport, being that it is an exercise in “shut-up and do as you are told” the American public is being trained to follow unconstitutional orders from marginally trained minions.
Now in the present, we have been presented with a “disease” with a 99+% survival rate. The government response to this, has been to issue totally unconstitutional orders to shut-down business and mandate unproven prophylactic measures for everyone to follow under threat of being guilt-tripped for causing the death of some unfortunate citizen.
Logical_analysis 